Nerman Fatic vs George Tsivadze Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs G. Tsivadze

Nerman Fatic

BIH

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

214

C. Rank

893

191

Best Rank

733

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

George Tsivadze

GEO

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

214

C. Rank

893

191

Best Rank

733

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 1 Tsivadze

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 0 and George Tsivadze winning 2. The last match between George Tsivadze and Nerman Fatic was at the Georgia F1 (Telavi), 05-07-2017, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with George Tsivadze getting the victory 6-2 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	0
Tsivadze	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Georgia F1 (Telavi)(07-05-17)

Stats

George Tsivadze

Nerman Fatic

N. Fatic vs G. Tsivadze H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Tsivadze
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$0
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	48.48% (160-170)
0	Clay	1
12	Titles	0
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs G. Tsivadze Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.28% of points on their second serve, while George Tsivadze has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while George Tsivadze has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.41% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas George Tsivadze has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 73.91% of matches played (W/L 51/18), with George Tsivadze winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). George Tsivadze has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 84/76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 32% (W/L 6/13).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as George Tsivadze has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 0 times and George Tsivadze being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 0 and George Tsivadze winning 2.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and George Tsivadze was at the Georgia F1 (Telavi), 05-07-2017, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with George Tsivadze getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.61 while George Tsivadze has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 84% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while George Tsivadze has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 33.70% of breakpoint opportunities, and George Tsivadze has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs George Tsivadze Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs G. Tsivadze H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Tsivadze
0	H2H Matches Won	1
0	Sets Won	2
4	Games Won	12
0	Aces (Total)	1
3	Total Double Faults	0
1:6:0	Average Match Time	1:6:0
64% (38/59)	1st Serve %	71% (29/41)
37% (14/38)	1st Serve Win %	72% (21/29)
48% (10/21)	2nd Serve Win %	42% (5/12)
50% (2/4)	Break Pts Won %	55% (6/11)
37% (15/41)	Return Points Win %	59% (35/59)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

G. Tsivadze Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Telavi - 23-10-2023
R1 Ivan DenisovI. Denisov	L	6-2 7-6(4)	Stats
Q3 Dmitry DolzhenkovD. Dolzhenkov	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q2 Savelii ShpitaS. Shpita	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
M25 Telavi - 16-10-2023
Q2 Josh ReidJ. Reid	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
M25 Telavi - 09-10-2023
Q2 Sasha MerzettiS. Merzetti	L	7-6(6) 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs G. Tsivadze Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	G. Tsivadze
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	48.48% (160/170)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	49.06% (365/379)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	50.23% (3381/3350)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	47.14% (66/74)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	52.50% (84/76)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	33.33% (10/20)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.12
1598	Aces Total	407
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.14
1517	Total Double Faults	457
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1st Match
509.29	Average Opponent Rank	506.26
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	64% (7158/11201)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	64% (4575/7158)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (1898/4043)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	45% (509/1130)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	41% (4502/11113)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	20.00% (2/8)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/1)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	49.53% (158/161)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (152/313)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	44% (4/9)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	37% (26/71)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	44% (35/80)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (171/144)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (171/27)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (159/16)